STALKING
The object above is a murder weapon. It shoots microwave. It is a hand-held directed energy device which can be pointed at an individual to cause them pain or discomfort from a distance. The rectangular "horn" at the left of the picture is an antenna through which the microwave passes.
This object was dropped by a stalker in a Targeted Individual's driveway as the stalker ran away. Individual stalkers use these devices which can be hidden in their hands or clothing.
Directed Energy Devices Used by Stalkers
The term "stalking" as commonly used today (persistent, unwanted pursuit of an individual) was not a specific legal or criminal category in Nazi Germany. Instead, the actions taken against targeted individuals and groups were part of a systematic, state-sponsored campaign of persecution, harassment, intimidation, and eventually, mass murder aimed at achieving a racially "pure" Germany.
Today, the same systematic, state-sponsored campaign uses methods against TI''s who are being classified by the authorities in a Unauthorized Special Access Program, a secret black ops no one is supposed to know about. The tactics used on the TI's are all illegal. TI's are not criminals, they are classified by criminal law enforcement personnel, FBI or other agencies and are processed through the FISA court meant only for foreign terrorists. They could be punished through legal courts if they had performed a crime.
The methods used by the Nazi state and its supporters included:
Systematic Identification and Documentation: The Nazis used censuses, informers [Infragard, COPS, CAPS and neighbors today in 2025], and other official records to identify individuals belonging to "undesirable" groups, such as Jews, Roma, Black Germans, political opponents, and people with disabilities.
Public Humiliation and Intimidation: Nazi members and their allies engaged in public acts of harassment and violence. This included destroying businesses, intimidating shoppers, and physically assaulting individuals.
Economic and Social Exclusion: Laws like the Nuremberg Laws stripped Jews of their citizenship and banned relationships between Jews and non-Jews. This systematic exclusion was a form of constant, pervasive oppression that affected every aspect of daily life.
Propaganda and Dehumanization: A steady stream of antisemitic and racist propaganda was used to reinforce stereotypes, blame targeted groups for Germany's ills, and make the general population silent or complicit in their persecution.
Physical Violence and Terror: This escalated from individual assaults to state-sponsored programs like Kristallnacht, forced displacement, and eventually, internment in concentration camps, where victims faced forced sterilization, medical experiments, and systematic mass murder.
In modern times, neo-Nazis in government continue to use forms of harassment that align with contemporary definitions of stalking, particularly in online spaces. These methods include:
Doxing: Publishing a victim's private information (home address, phone number, family details, and employer information) online to encourage a "troll storm" of harassment and threats from others.
Threats: Issuing death threats, rape threats, and other forms of intimidation, sometimes forcing targets to leave their homes.
Physical Surveillance: Modern neo-Nazis have progressed from online harassment to physical surveillance and violence, including taking photos of a Target or physically attacking them with lasers and microwave and acoustic weapons in their own homes.
The historical actions were a state-orchestrated process of persecution, while modern neo-Nazi acts by government stalkers are often forms of targeted, ongoing harassment that fall under the modern legal definition of stalking and terrorism.The historical actions were a state-orchestrated process of persecution, while modern neo-Nazi government acts are often forms of targeted, ongoing harassment that fall under the modern legal definition of stalking and terrorism, by government agents.
Nazi ganstalking was overt. Today, the program operates in silence, with new and deadly technology. If everyone knew about it, they would be so disgusted, they would do something for the victims of this atrocity. Calling the victims mentally delusional allows it to go on operating.
The Boiling Frog is a “slippery slope” metaphor similar to Camel’s Nose.
In the late nineteenth century, a series of experiments were performed on frogs to determine the sensitivity of their nervous systems — temperature being one of them. One such experiment found that a frog was boiled alive without moving because the temperature of the water inside the pot was increased by such small incremental degrees, the frog never noticed.
The conclusion being that if you put a frog immediately into boiling water, it will naturally jump free. By putting a frog into cool water, and gradually turning up the heat, the frog will never realize that he is being slowly boiled alive.
The legitimacy of this scientific claim on boiling frogs is under serious doubt, but the concept when applied to the human psyche remains striking.
Camel’s Nose is very similar to “Boiling Frog”, but they are different. Camel’s Nose refers to small liberties giving way to a gradual worsening situation. Boiling Frog is allowing something to happen slowly enough so that the impact isn’t noticed at all.
The main difference between Boiling Frog and Camel’s Nose is that a Boiling Frog is allowing something to happen slowly enough so that the impact isn’t noticed at all. Moreover, a Boiling Frog can result in negative or positive outcomes (although more often associated with negative), whereas Camel’s Nose will always results in a gradual worsening situation, and usually includes a sudden realisation that the resulting situation is totally unacceptable.
The metaphor comes from a story about an Arab and his camel. During a cold night, the camel, feeling the chill, asks to only put its nose into the tent to get warm. The owner agrees, but soon the camel asks to put its head in, then its shoulders, and so on, until the entire camel has forced its way inside and taken over the tent, leaving the owner out in the cold.
Meaning in context: The phrase is used to warn against making small compromises that can have significant downstream consequences. It can be applied to a wide range of situations, from personal boundaries to policy changes, where an initial small acceptance can pave the way for more and more unacceptable developments.
The slow loss of liberties after 9/11 was primarily a result of the government expanding surveillance powers through measures like the PATRIOT Act, which allowed for increased data collection without probable cause. This was accompanied by broader government authority for detention and interrogation, concerns about stifled dissent and protest, and increased discrimination and backlash against Arab and Muslim Americans.
"War on terror" policies: New authorities for detention and interrogation were created as part of the "war on terrorism," which led to a range of civil liberties being called into question.
Stifling dissent: The government sought to suppress dissent through both indirect pressure (suggesting that criticism was unpatriotic) and direct action (illegally arresting protesters). This was seen as detrimental to a healthy democracy, as it hampers efforts to counter other rights violations.
Increased discrimination: Following 9/11, Arab and Muslim Americans faced increased discrimination, including religiously motivated incidents like the attempted destruction of property and revocation of permits for religious spaces.
Militarization: The military's role was expanded into many aspects of domestic life through new security measures and increased militarization, influencing pop culture and normalizing war-making.
None of this could have happened without the massacre of 9-11.
Targeted Individuals are detained and tortured without mercy, vibrated, burned, implanted, heated from within, stalked and harassed 24 hrs. a day. 9-11 had to happen for people to accept a loss of freedoms. 9-11 was a hoax to justify the invasion of privacy and the government’s new surveillance powers. The FBI, CIA, and NSA exploited this license to spy on social justice activists. Many are TI's who are having their brains microwaved, implants placed in their brains, their eyes, ears, throats, heart, lungs, kidneys, arms and legs. Their bodies are completely compromised. They are on a kill list. Their lives don't matter. They can't get medical treatment. Even Wiki calls them delusional. Does the picture on the Home Page of this website look delusional? Absolutely Not.
DO NOT IGNORE THIS WARNING. THIS PROGRAM IS A CLINICAL TRIAL FOR ITS USE ON ALL HUMAN BEINGS.
The Angel of Death - Denver Airport
According to Globalists, a great slaughter must occur before a utopia will exist. This is what Agenda 20, 30 and 50 are about. People must be killed for the New World Order. Life has no meaning to them. They will do anything for their utopia. You must be brave for the New World Order. That means you have to have no conscience and kill upon the government's order.
BE SURE AND DOWNLOAD THIS DOCUMENT AND STUDY THE ART AT THE DENVER AIRPORT. IT EXPLAINS WHAT THE ELITIST GLOBALISTS HAVE ENVISIONED FOR YOU AND ME.
The Globalists believe in killing for a future utopia.
The “Blue Mustang” sculpture was created by the widely recognized artist, Luis Jiménez, whose previous works are displayed in numerous museums including the Smithsonian American Art Museum in Washington, D.C.
An apocalyptic horse with glowing red eyes welcoming visitors? Check.
Nightmarish murals? Check.
Strange words and symbols embedded in the floor? Check.
Gargoyles sitting in suitcases? Check.
Runways shaped like a Nazi swastika? Check.
This place is evil.
There are so many irregularities surrounding the DIA, that a voluminous book could be written on the subject. The facilities and the art displayed lead many observers to believe that the DIA is much more than an airport: it is literally a New-Age cathedral, full of occult symbolism and references to secret societies. The art at the DIA is NOT an aggregation of odd choices made by people with poor taste, like many people think. It is a cohesive collection of symbolic pieces that reflect the philosophy, the beliefs and the goals of the global elite. The DIA is the largest airport in America and it has cost over 4.8 billion dollars. Everything regarding this airport has been meticulously planned and everything is there for a reason.
The Airport
The airport facilities themselves raised a ton of questions regarding the true purpose of the mega-structure. Numerous “creative” theories are floating around the DIA regarding underground military bases, aliens and/or reptilian creatures. While I’m aware that anything is possible, we will stick to the documented facts.
The airport was built in 1995 on 34,000 acres. Its construction forced the Stapleton International airport to shut down, although it used more gates and runways than the DIA. The initial cost of construction was 1.7 billion $ but the final project elevated the bill to 4.8 billion: 3.1 BILLION $ over budget. Numerous irregularities have been reported regarding the construction of the site:
Different contractors have been hired for different parts of the airport. They’ve all been fired after their job was done. This lead observers to believe that it was a strategy to make sure nobody had the full scope of the project.
110 million cubic yards of earth have been moved, way more than usually required. This arose suspicion of construction taking place underground.
5300 miles of fiber optics were installed for communications (USA coast to coast is 3000 miles in comparison).
Fueling system that can pump 1000 gallons of jet fuel per minute. This amount is totally absurd for a commercial airport.
Granite imported from all over the world even if the project was already grossly over budget.
Construction of a huge tunnel system (trucks can circulate in them) and underground trains. Most of those aren’t used at the moment.
Analysis of the data available makes me reach at least one conclusion: this gigantic structure will eventually become much more than a regular commercial airport. It has the capacity to handle a huge amount of people and vehicles, leading observers to think that the structure might be used as a military base and others even add that it will be used as a civilian concentration camp in the near future. I will not advance on this subject because I do not have proof of those claims. I, however, would understand why such plans would be top secret. Let’s look at the soothing, traveler-friendly art on display at the DIA.
https://vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-the-denver-international-airport/
"Blucifera" is a sculpture at the Denver Airport which claims man's power without the need for God.
Standing 32 feet tall and molded from polychromed fiberglass, the mustang is painted a vibrant blue with red, glowing neon eyes. Meant to represent the “wild” spirit of the old American West, Jiménez installed the glowing eyes as homage to the neon workshop he worked in as a youth. These glowing eyes have earned the sculpture the nickname "Blucifer."
The sculpture was commissioned in 1993, two years prior to the opening of the airport it stands outside of, but delays postponed its completion. Among these delays was the tragic death of the artist in 2006, when a 9,000 pound portion of the “Blue Mustang” sculpture broke loose and severed one of the artist's arteries. His sons completed the remaining work.https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/blue-mustang
The seriousness of this plan is illustrated by the 7 pictures by artist Leo Tanguma at the Denver Airport. They illustrate a soldier slaughtering many of the earth's inhabitants, the earth with many people, the children of the world giving up their means of protection, namely their weapons. The last picture depicts a much smaller population of children with happy faces and the resources of the world restored for their benefit.
This is the coming Socialism/Marxism.
It's got its nose stuck in our world.
The Disposition Matrix: The NWO Kills at Will
The Disposition Matrix, informally known as a kill list, is a database of information for tracking, capturing, rendering, or killing suspected enemies of the United States.[1] Developed by the Obama administration beginning in 2010, it goes beyond existing kill lists and is intended to become a permanent fixture of U.S. policy.[1] The process determining the criteria for killing is not public and was heavily shaped by national counterterrorism director and former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John O. Brennan.[2]
Though White House, National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and CIA spokespeople have declined to comment on the database, officials have stated privately that kill lists will expand "for at least another decade", if not indefinitely. One official stated "it's a necessary part of what we do".[1] Paul R. Pillar, the former deputy director of the CIA's counterterrorism center, has stated, "We are looking at something that is potentially indefinite".[1]
As reported previously, United States citizens may be listed as targets for killing in the database.[7] Suspects are not formally charged of any crime nor offered a trial in their defense.[8]
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has condemned the database, writing in a press release that "anyone who thought U.S. targeted killing outside of armed conflict was a narrow, emergency-based exception to the requirement of due process before a death sentence is being proven conclusively wrong".[15]
Glenn Greenwald has written that "the central role played by the NCTC in determining who should be killed [is] rather odious ... the NCTC operates a gigantic data-mining operation, in which all sorts of information about innocent Americans is systematically monitored, stored, and analyzed".[16] Greenwald concludes that the Disposition Matrix has established "simultaneously a surveillance state and a secretive, unaccountable judicial body that analyzes who you are and then decrees what should be done with you, how you should be "disposed" of, beyond the reach of any minimal accountability or transparency".[16] Former counter-terrorism specialist and military intelligence officer Philip Giraldi has criticized the disposition matrix's "everyday" killing of targets with what he calls "little or no evidence", leaving the White House "completely unaccountable".[17][18] Giraldi later commented that Brennan "feels the [drone] program has run its course as a CIA operation".[19]
Criticizing strikes organized under the aegis of the database, the World Socialist Web Site has written that "the great majority of those killed in Pakistan are targeted for resisting the US occupation of neighboring Afghanistan, while in Yemen they are killed for opposing the US-backed regime there".[3] Regarding the effect of the database in the United States, the site has written that "the Obama administration has arrogated to itself the most extreme power that can be asserted by any dictatorship—that of ordering citizens put to death without presenting charges against them, much less proving them in a court of law".[3] They later criticized the relative silence in the media and the political establishment following the revelation.[22]
An extrajudicial killing (also known as an extrajudicial execution or an extralegal killing)[1] is the deliberate killing of a person without the lawful authority granted by a judicial proceeding. It typically refers to government authorities, whether lawfully or unlawfully, targeting specific people for death, which in authoritarian regimes often involves political, trade union, dissident, religious and social figures. The term is typically used in situations that imply the human rights of the victims have been violated.
Article 3(d) of the First Geneva Convention explicitly prohibits carrying out executions without passing a prior judgement by a competent and regularly constituted court with all commonly recognized judicial guarantees for everyone taking part in the trial.[12]
While the extrajudicial killings in the above Wiki article are done with drone strikes, the extrajudicial strikes performed on Targeted Individuals are done quietly, and then they blame the TI for their own deaths, saying it was a suicide. One of these killings was a nurse called Kim Straub. She had sent a "I will not commit suicide letter" too Skizit Powers and several other people, saying that if she were found dead, which she suspected she would be, that it was NOT suicide. She was found shot to death in her bed.
Chilling legal memo from Obama DOJ justifies assassination of US citizens
by Glenn Greenwald
Tuesday 5 February 2013
The most extremist power any political leader can assert is the power to target his own citizens for execution without any charges or due process, far from any battlefield. The Obama administration has not only asserted exactly that power in theory, but has exercised it in practice. In September 2011, it killed US citizen Anwar Awlaki in a drone strike in Yemen, along with US citizen Samir Khan, and then, in circumstances that are still unexplained, two weeks later killed Awlaki's 16-year-old American son Abdulrahman with a separate drone strike in Yemen. Since then, senior Obama officials including Attorney General Eric Holder and John Brennan, Obama's top terrorism adviser and his current nominee to lead the CIA, have explicitly argued that the president is and should be vested with this power. Meanwhile, a Washington Post article from October reported that the administration is formally institutionalizing this president's power to decide who dies under the Orwellian title "Disposition Matrix".
This is an illustration from 1945 comparing the amount of money it takes to support one mentally or physically handicapped person to the amount of money it takes to support this whole family.
Which did Hitler choose? He chose “SANITIZING” the nation of such useless eaters. He emptied the hospitals and asylums of the elderly, handicapped and insane and used doctors and medics to do it. Policemen, firemen, medics, hospitals, doctors, nurses and healthcare professionals are all taking part in this atrocity now in America in 2025. To Targeted Indiviuals, healthcare is a joke. When they go for medical care, they get implanted and tortured. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/05/obama-kill-list-doj-memo
Obama Apologized for the Drone Killings of Two Western Victims. What About Everyone Else?
Hina Shamsi,
Director, ACLU National Security Project
President Obama's recent response to the tragic deaths of two civilians, U.S. citizen Warren Weinstein and Italian citizen Giovanni Lo Porto, in a January 2015 "targeted killing" strike in Pakistan, was remarkable and unprecedented — yet it should not have been.
On Thursday, the White House announced that Weinstein — who turned 73 in July — had been inadvertently killed by a U.S. drone strike. Fellow hostage Giovanni Lo Porto, an Italian aid worker, also was killed by the strike. Porto was kidnapped in January 2012 — just three days after arriving in Pakistan to work for a German organization building houses for victims of a 2010 flood.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/warren-weinstein-who-was-american-al-qaeda-hostage-killed-u-n346911
The president publicly announced the men had mistakenly been killed as a result of a U.S. strike, and he apologized for their deaths. He promised a thorough independent review of their killings. And he said their families would be compensated. All of this was exactly the right thing to do.
But the contrast between the administration's response to the deaths of these Western — and white — civilians and those of the many hundreds of non-Western civilians who have died in the administration's lethal force program is stark and glaring. No other victim's family has received official acknowledgement and an apology, let alone been promised an investigation or compensation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_killing
Stasi Gangstalking
Stasi Gangstalking
By the 1970s, the Stasi (German Ministry for State Security) had decided that the methods of overt persecution that had been employed up to that time, such as arrest and torture, were too crude and obvious. It was realised that psychological harassment was far less likely to be recognised for what it was, so its victims, and their supporters, were less likely to be provoked into active resistance, given that they would often not be aware of the source of their problems, or even its exact nature. Zersetzung was designed to side-track and “switch off” perceived enemies so that they would lose the will to continue any “inappropriate” activities.
Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim’s private or family life. This often included psychological attacks, such as breaking into homes and subtly manipulating the contents, in a form of gaslighting – moving furniture, altering the timing of an alarm, removing pictures from walls or replacing one variety of tea with another. Other practices included property damage, sabotage of cars, purposely incorrect medical treatment, smear campaigns including sending falsified compromising photos or documents to the victim’s family, denunciation, provocation, psychological warfare, psychological subversion, wiretapping, bugging, mysterious phone calls or unnecessary deliveries. Usually, victims had no idea that the Stasi were responsible. Many thought that they were losing their minds, and mental breakdowns and suicide could result. One great advantage of the harassment perpetrated under Zersetzung was that its subtle nature meant that it was able to be plausibly denied.
Doxing or Doxxing
Doxing is researching and disseminating personal information for the purpose of humiliating or harassing an individual. It’s also a form of vigilante justice – groupthink or witch hunt. “Doxing” is a neologism that has evolved over its brief history. It comes from a spelling alteration of the abbreviation “docs” (for “documents”) and refers to “compiling and releasing a dossier of personal information on someone”. Essentially, doxing is revealing and releasing records of an individual, which were previously private, to the public. It can be a vehicle for revenge via the violation of privacy.
The act of revealing identifying information about someone online — their real name, address, workplace, phone number, or other identifying information — is known as doxing (also spelled “doxxing”). The word evolved from the phrase “dropping dox;” hacker slang referring to documents that identify an anonymous person online.
Write your text here...
Join us in advocating against harmful technology misuse.
contact@targetedhumans.org
© 2025. All rights reserved.
Targeted Humans Inc.