CLIMATE CHANGE
Gregory Gardner
BMJ. 1998 Apr 11; 316(7138):1164.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7138.1164
Editor—The apocalyptic tone that Smith adopted in relation to the environment bears little relation to reality.1 In his editorial Smith asserts, “virtually all scientists agree that global warming is happening.” Global warming is now joining the list of “what everyone knows.”
Whether most scientists outside climatology believe that global warming is happening is less relevant than whether the climatologists do. A letter signed by over 50 leading members of the American Meteorological Society warned about the policies promoted by environmental pressure groups. “The policy initiatives derive from highly uncertain scientific theories. They are based on the unsupported assumption that catastrophic global warming follows from the burning of fossil fuel and requires immediate action. We do not agree.”2 Those who have signed the letter represent the overwhelming majority of climate change scientists in the United States, of whom there are about 60. McMichael and Haines quote the 1995 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is widely believed to “prove” that climate change induced by humans has occurred.3 The original draft document did not say this. What happened was that the policymakers’ summary (which became the “take home message” for politicians) altered the conclusions of the scientists. This led Dr Frederick Seitz, former head of the United States National Academy of Sciences, to write, “In more than sixty years as a member of the American scientific community ... I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”4
Policymaking should be guided by proved fact, not speculation. Most members of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change believe that current climate models do not accurately portray the atmosphere-ocean system. Measurements made by means of satellites show no global warming but a cooling of 0.13°C between 1979 and 1994.5 Furthermore, since the theory of global warming assumes maximum warming at the poles, why have average temperatures in the Arctic dropped by 0.88°C over the past 50 years?
References
1.Smith R. Climate change: decision time in Kyoto. BMJ. 1997;315:1326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1326. . (22 November.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Michaels P. Conspiracy, consensus or correlation? What scientists think about the ‘popular vision’ of global warming. World Climate Review. 1993;1:11. [Google Scholar]
3.McMichael AJ, Haines A. Global climate change: the potential effects on health. BMJ. 1997;315:805–809. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7111.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Seitz F. Major deception on global warning. Wall Street Journal 1996 June 12;section A:16(col 3).
5.Balling RC. Global warming: messy models, decent data and pointless policy. In: Bailey R, editor. The true state of the planet. New York: Free Press; 1995. pp. 83–107. [Google Scholar]
Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1112950/
Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening
Enhancement of ionospheric heating effect by chemical release
Hai‑Sheng Zhao 1 , Jie Feng 1*, Zheng‑Wen Xu 1 , Ya‑Xin Liu 1 , Kun Xue 1 , Jian Wu 2 , Cheng Wang 3 , Shou‑Zhi Xie 1 & Huai‑Yun Peng 1
Who is heating the ionosphere? Scientists have been pumping the ionosphere with heat from heaters(HAARP, Eiscat, SURA) since the 1970's.
In addition to heating the ionosphere with electromagnetic waves, they use chemicals such as SF6 to create holes which, as a greenhouse gas, contributes to global warming in a similar way to carbon dioxide (CO2), though it’s much more potent than CO2. Its concentration in Earth's troposphere reached 12.06 parts per trillion (ppt) in February 2025, rising at 0.4 ppt/year, but by displacing oxygen in the lungs, it also carries the risk of asphyxia if too much is inhaled. ·As a result of its inertness, SF6 has an atmospheric lifetime between 800- 3,200 years, and no significant environmental sinks other than the ocean. Waveguides in high-power microwave systems are pressurized with it. The gas electrically insulates the waveguide, preventing internal arcing.
Scientific studies use SF6:
Why don't some people believe in climate change?
Myth 3. Heatwaves and wildfires have nothing to do with climate change
Climate change makes extreme weather more frequent and intense, including heatwaves, wildfires and floods.
The evidence shows that extreme heatwaves have increased since the 1950s and human-induced climate change is the main driver; with every additional increment of global warming, these extremes continue to increase.
Because climate change creates warmer and drier conditions, even if a wildfire is started as a result of human activity, there is more fuel available when vegetation is very dry, and the relative humidity of the air will be lower, allowing fires to spread further and faster. In addition, the global wildfire season is getting longer, due to higher temperatures and longer droughts.
Wildfires can pose an immediate threat to the lives of people and animals in the area, as well as causing damage to soil, vegetation and whole ecosystems. Smoke and ash from wildfires pollute air, water and land.
WWF-UK is a registered charity in England, Wales and Scotland.
https://www.wwf.org.uk/updates/here-are-10-myths-about-climate-change
The reaasons why people don't believe in climate change:
Extreme weather has been superceded by man-made weather. It serves a political purpose.
The military use of the weather was expressed clearly in "Controlling the weather by 2025." https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA333462.pdf
See pages 22-24 on creating space mirrors for bouncing radiation off of for warfare. Lasers could be used for weather control methods, such as creating plasma channels to influence cloud formation or using the laser's reflection to redirect solar energy. You will be told the technology does not exist. Don't believe it. If it is possible, the military is weaponizing it.
The other possibilities are: Cloud seeding: Intense laser pulses could ionize gas in the atmosphere, creating plasma channels that could trigger cloud formation and rainfall. Atmospheric interaction: Lasers could cause rapid heating of the atmosphere, creating localized effects like mini-lightning bolts as the air expands and contracts. It cana cause extremely high winds needed for plasma fires like Paradise and the other California fires.
We see cycles of chemtrails make our weather. We see ground laser pumps priming the sky for storms. Extreme weather has broken records for the strength of hurricanes, ice storms, tornadoes, floods, droughts. Ground lasers, chemtrails, and other phenomena are all man-made. People like Mike Morales are killed for showing us the satellite feeds that show hurricanes being pumped up with chemical injections and the rockets that were set off to create the Paradise Fire. We are not idiots. We see!
We don't believe the government. The US government has proven itself to be false to its people. Like the neocon philosophy, its lies all the time. We don't trust the government because it has proven it is willing to kill at will. It is killing TI's at will.
The globalist agenda claims it kills anyone necessary to achieve its Socialist/Marxist goals [through unnaturally hot plasma fires, floods, hurricanes, etc.]. We see that!
Join us in advocating against harmful technology misuse.
contact@targetedhumans.org
© 2025. All rights reserved.
Targeted Humans Inc.